Psychoanalysis Theory
Psychoanalysis
- Introduction
- Sigmund Freud
- Major works
- The metapsychology of psychoanalysis
- Psychoanalysis as Psychotherapy
Psychoanalysis is an independent discipline of the human sciences that was founded by the neurologist Sigmund Freud at the end of the 19th century in Vienna and has been continuously developed ever since. The ceaseless further development is already visible in the work of Freud himself, who throughout his life advanced, expanded and, if necessary, revised his concepts and theories.
Psychoanalysis has its own special examination method,
a differentiated personality and developmental psychology (metapsychology), a
comprehensive pathology derived from this and finally a treatment method that
is used in the various forms of psychoanalytic psychotherapy.
As depth psychology, psychoanalysis is interested in the individual, always socially shaped, unconscious in humans. It essentially determines the perception, the interpretation and the way the individual deals with himself and his environment.
Psychoanalysis asks about the "why" and the
"what for" of human experience and behavior. In doing so, she does
not stop at the processing of the mostly childish unresolved experiences, as is
sometimes criticized. She also examines their significant references in the
entire biographical and also current experiences and their effects on the
shaping of the future. It sensitizes people to use an “infinite analysis”, that
is, constant questioning and reflection, to explore the meaning and meaning of
their actions and life.
In this respect, psychoanalysis is a form of the
incessant search for truth, as Freud put it. Today we speak more of a constant
effort to gain knowledge and a never-ending questioning of the meaning of
experience and behavior. Therein lies the emancipatory function of
psychoanalysis.
By striving to uncover individual and collective
self-deceptions, fallacies, illusions and perceptual distortions, she helps
people to find touch with their depths and shallows. In this sense, it is also
disturbing and uncomfortable. She must therefore always reckon with resistance
and rejection. However, they must first be regarded as an individual or
collective protective reaction, since psychoanalytic investigation cannot avoid
shaking the always imperfect, provisional and unstable balance that every human
being and society is constantly striving to establish and maintain.
Psychoanalysis as a scientific research method
The goal of psychoanalytic investigation is to
understand, above all, the unconscious meanings of emotional experiences,
interactions, thoughts, speech, actions and visual images (e.g. dreams,
mistakes, fantasies, delusions, artistic products).
Insofar as it relates to social phenomena in the same
way (for example: collective values, social trends, zeitgeist), psychoanalysis
is also a cultural theory or culturally critical.
Psychoanalytic investigation consists in a special
form of encounter between people. It is primarily a conversation, albeit one
with certain rules of the game, different from ordinary communication. The
basic psychoanalytic rule encourages the analysand to express everything that
he senses, what he feels and what comes to mind whether it is unpleasant, embarrassing or
seems inappropriate and unimportant as unselected and uncensored as possible.
The psychoanalyst attempts to meet these free associations with evenly
suspended attention; that is, nothing is prioritized, weighted, or valued a
priori. In so doing, the analyst enters into a state of greatest possible
openness in his feeling, thinking and knowing, he tries to open up as much
space as possible for the unconscious activity of the analysand and for
himself. However, the freedom of the analysand's ideas is limited by the
tension between many factors. These include his suffering, his desire for
self-expression, his need for self-concealment, his transference, his
resistance and the effort to preserve his hard-won mental balance.
However much an analyst may try to approach his
analysand with attentive restraint (abstinence), it is inevitable that he will
be distinguished by, for example, age, sex, the setting of his practice, the
way he speaks, and much more Affected analysand. Conversely, every analysand
triggers a wealth of inner movements in the analyst. It is therefore one of his
constant tasks to differentiate his countertransference, that is, his mental
reaction to the patient's offers of transference, from his own inevitable
transference to his analysand and to recognize the latter as far as possible
through reflection.
Transference is a phenomenon that is effective in all
relationships, including all psychotherapeutic relationships of any type of
therapy. It means that a current experience situation is unconsciously
interpreted according to the pattern of an earlier one. In the pathological
case, this means that a patient misunderstands the present (Greenson) according
to his past to which he is fixated. The analyst acts as a screen of
transmission in the analysand's phantasies, assuming certain roles of earlier
relationships or representing aspects of the analysand's self. In the
transference-countertransference scenes between the two, i.e. the initially
largely unconscious reciprocal role expectations and assignments, old, above
all unresolved and unresolved relationship constellations come to life again.
The specific relationship between analyst and
analysand has become increasingly important, as psychoanalysis has developed.
In therapeutic practice, this is expressed in the fact that the relationship
between the two is taken into account as a possible form of expression of the
patient's unconscious relationship conflicts and constellations. More and more
importance is attached to the helpful relationship as a therapeutic tool.
All the unconscious forces and defense mechanisms that
stand in the way of becoming conscious of what is repressed are called
resistance. The patient's "free" ideas in the sense just described do
not turn out to be accidental, but show the "determining order" of
the unconscious. From a psychoanalytic point of view, “determinism” means that
“everything has its meaning” and that the psychic present is shaped by the
individual and collective past experience. Accordingly, the task of
psychoanalysis consists in the “battle for memory” (Alexander Mitscherlich)
against unconscious resistance, to make recognizable, to reconstruct and to
interpret the unconscious biographical contexts of meaning and meaning in the
current experience and behavior. As a community of experience, thought and
speech, a psychoanalytic process essentially represents an attempt to expand
and change perception.
The most important instrument of psychoanalytic
investigation is the attentively involved psychoanalyst himself, with his
reserve and a productive approach to his preconscious and unconscious. In
addition to many years of theoretical and practical further training, he has
completed several years of personal training analysis in order to prepare for
this task. The analyst tries to be as open and empathetic as possible about the
phenomena he is dealing with, to re-experience them and to classify them
intellectually through understanding reflection.
In the dreams, mistakes, symptoms and other mental
productions of people and in the ideas of the analysand, the analyst encounters
the unconscious contents predominantly in a distorted, shifted and condensed
form, in symbolic representation. They therefore require an interpretation. In
a similar way to the patients' free associations, the psychoanalytic
investigation also turns to the depth psychological interpretation of poetry,
religious or mythological creations and other collective and social phenomena.
After all, since its beginnings as a science,
psychoanalysis has continuously made itself the object of its analysis (e.g. in
the formation of theories or with regard to further developments in treatment
technology). In addition to her own research instrument, she also uses other
methods, for example empirical methods, without completely submitting to the
scientific zeitgeist of quantification. There is now a wealth of empirical and
scientific evidence for the importance of certain psychoanalytic concepts and
the efficiency of psychoanalytic treatments.
The metapsychology of psychoanalysis
Psychoanalytic theory is a complex system of
hypotheses about the functioning and development of the mind. It is always
about the individual, but always in his social context. Since unconscious
content, like other mental phenomena, cannot usually be observed directly,
models and hypothetical constructs are essential prerequisites and tools for
grasping mental realities. Through constant interactions with clinical experience
and the inclusion of research results from neighboring disciplines (for
example: attachment theory, family therapy, brain research, constructivism,
neurobiology, infant research), the mental models of psychoanalysis are
constantly evolving. Thus, psychoanalytic metapsychology as a whole of
theoretical concepts is not a self-contained system. In addition, the image of
man and the "world view" of psychoanalysis is modified once again by
the individual anthropological basic assumptions of each individual
psychoanalyst. That is why it is actually impossible to speak of
“psychoanalysis”. The American psychoanalyst Pine recently distinguished
"four psychologies of psychoanalysis": drive psychology, ego
psychology, and self-psychology and object relations psychology. They cannot be
seamlessly mediated with one another; as a whole, however, they represent the
currently most important psychoanalytic approaches to mental events.
In the following, we give a brief historical overview
of different models of psychoanalysis:
In a first spatial, "topical" conceptual
model, Freud distinguished between the conscious, the preconscious, and the
unconscious. While the preconscious (the unnoticed, the automatic, and the
latent conscious) can become accessible to consciousness with relative ease,
the intrinsic or dynamic unconscious resists becoming conscious. The
functioning of the unconscious is called primary process. This means that the
usual orientations in space and time are lost, contradictions can exist side by
side, parts can stand for the whole, shifts can occur or complexes can be
condensed. All rational logic is switched off. Dreams are formed, for example,
by means of such primary process-like thought processes. The unconscious can
only be made conscious to a very limited extent if at all but it has a
serious effect on the subject's behavior and experience and the way he forms
his relationships.
The dynamic or economic model captures the fact that
there are forces and drives at work in mental life (needs, desires, affects,
sensations, energies, impulses) that are subject to certain laws. Above all, it
emphasizes the shaping of experience and behavior by drives or motivational
systems (e.g. sexuality, aggression, narcissism). Freud contrasted the pleasure
principle (striving for pleasure and avoiding pain) with the reality principle
(ability to postpone gratification and renunciation). In addition, modern ego
psychology has emphasized the principle of security (striving for security and
well-being in narcissistic equilibrium) and the intersubjective theory
(Benjamin) the principle of mutual reflection and recognition as fundamental
principles of regulation of psychological events.
In the structural or instance model, three areas of
the soul are separated from one another and examined in their dynamic
interaction: the ego, the id and the superego (with the ego ideal). The ego,
which has been researched and described in a differentiated manner by ego
psychology, with its regulation, coping, adaptation and defense mechanisms,
serves to organize, control, control and mediate and coordinate the authorities
(inner reality) with the environment (external reality).
In the id, in addition to innate parts, the drives,
needs and basic affects and what is repressed from consciousness are localized
in particular. The id is sometimes equated with the unconscious.
The super-ego includes above all the moral demands,
regulations and prohibitions of the world around us that have been internalized
during development, while the ego ideal contains the commands, ideals and
values. The superego has, among other things, the functions of conscience and
self-observation (Freud), has an ego-supporting and stabilizing effect, but
also acts as a judge, critic and censor. Both the ego and the superego consist
in part of unconscious areas.
From a genetic point of view (as developmental
psychology), psychoanalysis examines how phase-specific psychosocial
developmental challenges and crises are lived through. Depending on their
successful or unsuccessful course, their successful or unsuccessful attempts
and solutions, they lead to certain dimensions of identity (Erikson), to ego
maturity or to mental illness. For psychoanalysis since Freud, development has
always been a biographical agreement between “inner” (biological) and
“external” (social and cultural) nature in the sense of a supplementary series.
The interaction of innate parts and a resonant (responding) or non-resonant
environment can either promote the given potential of an individual to its development
or disturb it in the direction of a mental illness.
Psychoanalysis as Psychotherapy
The topicality and importance of psychoanalysis as a
form of psychotherapy results above all from its highly differentiated and
comprehensive development and personality theory and its pathology. No
psychoanalyst claims to be able to offer psychotherapy for all mental or
psychosomatic illnesses. The psychoanalyst is also extremely careful with the
term “healing”. However, psychoanalysis claims to be able to make a fundamental
contribution to the understanding of mental illnesses and their treatment
through other psychotherapeutic methods, for example as psychoanalytic
supervision in clinical institutions.
Psychoanalytic therapy is preceded by one or more
preliminary talks, so-called initial clinical interviews. They differ from a
medical anamnesis or psychiatric exploration in that they are intentionally
unstructured, which tries to offer the patient's psychic dynamics in the
analysand-analyst relationship as much freedom as possible. In principle, the
psychoanalyst's attention is not primarily focused on "objective"
facts, but rather on the subjective significance that what is expressed in
words or in physical or gestural expressions or what is kept secret has for
mental reality. On the one hand, the initial consultations are used for
diagnosis and indication, for example for financing by a health insurance
company. On the other hand, they also lead to a "subjective"
indication, in other words to answering the question of whether a specific
patient is able to enter into a productive therapeutic process of treatment and
change with a specific analyst.
In addition to classic psychoanalysis (several hours
per week using the couch), the range of psychoanalytic treatment offered in the
outpatient setting includes various modifications. Psychoanalytic and
psychoanalytically based psychotherapy are characterized by changes in the
"setting" (e.g. lower frequency of sessions, sitting opposite) and
methodological modifications. Psychotherapy based on depth psychology as a
psychoanalytically based treatment method is a form of therapy based on
psychoanalysis, limited to certain conflict issues and limited in time. It can
therefore be practiced in the most qualified way by psychoanalysts. In
psychoanalytic short or focal therapies, certain focal points or core conflicts
are subjected to psychotherapeutic treatment that is concentrated in terms of
time and content. Couples are treated in psychoanalytic couples therapy, groups
in psychoanalytic group psychotherapy and families in psychoanalytically
oriented family therapy. In the meantime, psychoanalytic treatment concepts
have also been developed for older people. Finally, psychoanalytic treatment
techniques are also used in inpatient settings.
0 Comments